The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (VAWA) is a United States federal law. It was passed as Title IV, sec. 40001-40703 of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 HR 3355 and signed as Public Law 103-322 by President Bill Clinton on September 13, 1994. It provided $1.6 billion to enhance investigation and prosecution of the violent crime perpetrated against women, increased pre-trial detention of the accused, imposed automatic and mandatory restitution on those convicted, and allowed civil redress in cases prosecutors chose to leave unprosecuted.
VAWA was drafted by Senator Joe Biden's office with support from a number of advocacy organizations including Legal Momentum and The National Organization for Women, which described the bill as "the greatest breakthrough in civil rights for women in nearly two decades."
VAWA was reauthorized by Congress in 2000, and again in December 2005. The bill was signed into law by President George W. Bush on January 5, 2006. [1]
VAWA will be up for reauthorization in 2010.
Contents |
Proposed Bill: International Violence Against Women Act of 2007
In 2007 Senator Biden proposed the International Violence Against Women Act. The bill did not pass either the Senate or the House. The bill is far-reaching in its scope and controversial in many of its provisions:
- Amends the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to establish in the Department of State the Office of Women's Global Initiatives (which shall replace the Office of International Women's Issues) to coordinate U.S. government efforts respecting international women's issues. Establishes within the Department an Advisory Commission on International Violence Against Women.
- Directs the President to develop a comprehensive strategy to prevent violence against women and girls. Directs the Coordinator of the Women's Global Initiatives to ensure that foreign assistance programs incorporate measures to prevent and respond to violence against women and girls. Provides that U.S. training of foreign military and police forces incorporates training on prevention of violence against women and girls.
- Directs the Department and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to assist programs that prevent and respond to violence against women and girls in all humanitarian relief, conflict, and post-conflict operations. Directs the Secretary of State to: (1) encourage U.N. member states to expand the number of female members of U.N. peacekeeping missions; and (2) take emergency measures to respond to violence against women and girls during conflict or post-conflict operations.
- Expresses the sense of Congress that the United Nations should strengthen its ability to prevent violence against women and girls by U.N. military and civilian personnel. Provides that Foreign Service training include instruction on prevention of violence against women and girls. Authorizes appropriations to support the United Nations Development Fund for Women Trust Fund in Support of Actions to Eliminate Violence Against Women.
The World Conference on Human Rights, held in Vienna in 1993, and the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women [2] in the same year, concluded that civil society and governments have acknowledged that domestic violence is a public health policy and human rights concern.
The World Health Organization [3] conducted an extensive study on world-wide domestic violence. Released in 2005, the study analyzed data from 10 countries and sheds new light on the prevalence of violence against women. It seeks to look at domestic violence from a public health policy perspective. The survey is viewed as controversial by many because it did not assess the extent of partner violence against men, and its failure to use a validated survey instrument.
The findings from this and other studies can be used to inform a more effective response from government, including the health, justice and social service sectors, as a step towards fulfilling the state’s obligation to curtail domestic violence under international human rights laws.
Criticisms of Domestic Violence Laws
Various persons and groups, including Marc H. Rudov, Glenn Sacks, Phyllis Schlafly, Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting (RADAR), and African-Americans for VAWA Reform (AAVR), have voiced concerns that VAWA violates due process, equal protection, and other civil rights.
The American Civil Liberties Union had originally expressed concerns about the Act, saying that the increased penalties were rash, the increased pretrial detention was "repugnant" to the US Constitution, the mandatory HIV testing of those only charged but not convicted is an infringement of a citizen’s right to privacy and the edict for automatic payment of full restitution was non-judicious (see their paper: "Analysis of Major Civil Liberties Abuses in the Crime Bill Conference Report as Passed by the House and the Senate", dated September 29, 1994). However, the ACLU has supported reauthorization of VAWA on the condition that the "unconstitutional DNA provision" be removed.[4] The ACLU, in their July 27, 2005 'Letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee Regarding the Violence Against Women Act of 2005, S. 1197' stated that "VAWA is one of the most effective pieces of legislation enacted to end domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking. It has dramatically improved the law enforcement response to violence against women and has provided critical services necessary to support women and children in their struggle to overcome abusive situations." [5]
In 2000, in a controversial 5-4 vote, the Supreme Court of the United States held part of VAWA unconstitutional in United States v. Morrison on federalism grounds. Only the civil rights remedy of VAWA was struck down. The provisions providing program funding were unaffected.[6]
References
- ^ www.whitehouse.gov
- ^ [1]
- ^ [2]
- ^ Tell Congress to Support the Violence Against Women Act
- ^ [3]
- ^ See: United States v. Morrison,529 U.S. 598, 627; "For these reasons, we conclude that Congress' power under § 5 does not extend to the enactment of § 13981.... The judgment of the Court of Appeals is Affirmed."
External links
- Violence Against Women Act
- Congressional Research Service (CRS) Reports regarding the Violence Against Women Act
- Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting
- Family Violence Prevention Fund
- Office on Violence Against Women
- Privacy Provisions of the Violence Against Women Act
- Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization
- World Health Organization Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women 2005
DadsDivorce.com: VAWA Reform pt. 2
Rick Ortiz, DadsDivorce.com editor talks with Elizabeth Crawford of the African Americans for VAWA (Violence Against Women Act)Reform.
Author: DadsDivorce
Keywords: rick ortiz dadsdivorce dads divorce dadsdivorce.com cordell vawa reform aavr.org aavr elizabeth crawford joe biden
Added: November 19, 2008
DadsDivorce.com: VAWA Reform pt. 1
Rick Ortiz, DadsDivorce.com editor talks with Elizabeth Crawford of the African Americans for VAWA (Violence Against Women Act)Reform.
Author: DadsDivorce
Keywords: rick ortiz dadsdivorce dads divorce dadsdivorce.com cordell vawa reform aavr.org aavr elizabeth crawford joe biden
Added: November 19, 2008
The Problem of Islam in Australia
Mufti of Australia: this was Muslim land - Before shrimp on the barbee, Foster's Lager, and Crocodile Dundee, evidently there was the burqa, the book, and the Prophet. MEMRI is reporting that the Mufti of Australia and New Zealand, Taj Al-Din Hamed Abdallah Al-Hilali, is claiming that Australia was originally Muslim land, settled by Afghans. The Aborigines are their descendants: "The strange thing was that when our muezzin [who accompanied Sheikh Al-Hilali on his visit to Alice Springs] stood up to call for prayer, the old people of the town came out, and so did men and youths, and they looked different than the black Aborigines. They were a mixture of Afghan and Aborigine, as a result of marriages of Afghan men and Aborigine women. When the muezzin called 'Allahu Akbar,' they said, 'We have heard this song from our ancestors...' When they asked us 'What is this song you are singing?' we told them that this was an announcement of prayer time. When we asked them their names, they answered John, or Steve, but their names ended with Saraj Al-Din, Abdallah, or Muhammad..." This sort of thing may just seem silly, or even cute, until one realizes that to anyone who takes the Sheikh's claim seriously, Australia is now Muslim land. Islamic law stipulates that Muslims possess by right any land that once formed part of the House of Islam; this is a key element of the claim to Israel put forward by Hamas and Islamic Jihad. The same claim has been advanced, by the way, for America. Al-Hilali, meanwhile, has already endorsed violent jihad in other contexts: Following a meeting with Hizbullah leader Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah, Sheikh Al-Hilali said: "I blessed Hizbullah for liberating the prisoners and the bones of the Shahids and I praised it and its sacrifice. Hizbullah has become a model for all the Mujahideen in the world... Most of the Australian people do not support the policy of the Australian government, which has placed Hizbullah on the terror list out of submission to the U.S., and the Australian prime minister will pay the price for this in the next elections..." . . . "We are proud of the Islamic resistance in Palestine, Lebanon, Kashmir, and everywhere in the world that seeks to achieve its legitimate rights in accordance with the international resolutions, the human rights conventions, and the U.N. resolutions... "We are also proud of the Islamic resistance that liberated southern Lebanon, led by Hizbullah, the legitimate Lebanese national movement, that forced the Israeli occupation army to withdraw from southern Lebanon, dragging trails of disappointment and shame behind it. "We are also proud of what Hamas and the Islamic Jihad are both doing in the occupied territories. We support the resistance and support, with all our might, the martyrdom operations carried out by the Palestinian liberation movements, operations that are a legitimate act against the cruel occupation, according to all international norms and conventions. "Also, whoever carries out a martyrdom [operation] is a pure Shahid and one of the men of Paradise. Moreover, he stands at the head of the Shahids." That is, of course, a suicide bombing. Al-Hilali also memorably dubbed Bush, Blair, and Australian PM John Howard the "axis of evil." But who is really behind it all? One guess: Sheikh Al-Hilali said on another occasion: "The media all over the world are controlled by Zionist fingers, particularly the Western media, and that includes Australia, in which the media are under Zionist hegemony. But in Australia, which unlike the West and the U.S. is multicultural, the media are less racist in their enmity to Muslims and Islam. This is evidenced by the fact that we won the last media battle in Australia and succeeded in forcing the Australian people to treat us with respect. We have not suffered from persecution or disrespect to the same extent that Islamic communities in Western countries and in America have suffered." ADDENDUM: Susan has referred me to two particularly egregious examples of Islamic mythmaking about a pre-Columbian Muslim America. Go here and click on "History."
Author: Ritterx101x
Keywords: Australia Australian Aussie islam allah evil terror terrorism radical muhammad muhammed violence torture jihad peace ummah umma clash western west westerm civilization islamization islamification conquest conquer Radical European Muslims muslim islamic militant EU UK Europe Lebanon Christianity Christendom political correct multiculturalism relativism cultural relativist
Added: November 19, 2008
GUILTY PALIN BUILT HER HOUSE IN ALASKA WITH TAX PAYER MONEY
JOHN MCKEATON5 MCCAIN OUTRAGEOUSLY VOTED AGAINST THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN PROTECTION ACT TWICE AND JOHN MCLIAR MCCAIN DID VOTE AGAINST THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT WHOS TO FLAME FOR GAS PRICES, UNEMPLOYMENT HIGHEST IN 5 YEARS (DURING BUSHS TERM), WORLD DISRESPECTING THE USA, AND YES FORECLOSURES - HERE IS WHY IT IS THE REPUBLICANS FAULT.. MCCAINS HISTORY: S&L SCANDAL - MCCAIN - KEATON CONTRIBUTIONS - 1987 MORTGAGE MELTDOWN - AMERIQUEST CONTRIBUTIONS - 2005 WALLSTREET BAILOUT - 2008 Here is how you got stuck paying the BAILOUT bill courtesy of Bush and McCain MCCAIN RECEIVED MONTHLY CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE PRESIDENT FOR DEREGULATIONS FOR THE PRIVATE LENDER AND TO INCREASE PROFIT BY INCREASING INTEREST RATES ON EXISTING LOANS IN 2005. WOW BUSH MCCAIN SCANDAL TIMELINE: -THE MORTGAGE MELTDOWN WAS NOT THE DEMOCRATS, CONSUMER, OR HOMEOWNERS FAULT, IT WAS THE POOR NAÏVE GREEDY AND FAIL REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP WITH REPUBLICAN SUPPORT -BUSH/MCCAIN BOTH HAVE A LONGTERM RELATIONSHIP WITH AMERIQUEST PRESIDENT ROLAND E. ARNALL -BUSHS NAÏVITY & GREED WANTED TO RAISE INTEREST RATES TO INCREASE BANK REVENUE LIKE OUR GAS PRICES - BANKS WERENT MAKING ENOUGH ON 3-5% INTEREST ONLY AND ADJUSTABLE ARM RATE LOANS -GREENSPAN REFUSED TO RAISE INTEREST RATES BECAUSE GREENSPAN KNEW IT WOULD OVER LOAD HOMEOWNERS BUDGETS AND TIGHTEN OUR ECONOMY FLOW. -BUSH THEN REPLACED GREENSPAN ON JANUARY 31, 2006 FOR A YES MAN (like McCain and palin) WITH BEN BERNANKE. -BEN BERNANKE THEN FOLLOWS BUSH ORDERS AND RAISES INTEREST RATES ON EXIST LOANS - YOUR MORTGAGE PAYMENT CONVENIENTLY GOES UP EVERY MONTH AND WHEN MOST ARMS WERE ABOUT TO EXPIRE -NOW WITH THE HIGHER INTEREST RATES LESS PEOPLE CAN AFFORD YOUR HOUSE BECAUSE MONEY IS MORE EXPENSIVE TO BORROW FROM LENDERS -MOST INTEREST ONLY AND ARM MORTGAGES WERE FROM PRIVATE LENDERS LIKE BUSH AND MCCAINS BUDDY THE PRESIDENT OF AMERIQUEST (On the same day that the White House announced that President Bush is nominating California billionaire Roland E. Arnall to be ambassador to the Netherlands, the company he controls said it would set aside $325 million for a possible settlement of allegations of predatory lending tactics.) -MCCAIN ALSO HAD A CONTINUED RELATIONSHIP FOR YEARS WITH AMERIQUEST PRESIDENT Roland E. Arnall AND RECEIVED DE-REGULATION MONEY TO VOTE IN AND RALLY OTHER REPUBLICANS TO VOTE FOR GREENSPANS REPLACEMENT, BEN BERNANKE TO FOLLOW BUSH ORDERS WITHOUT BERNANKE INPUT OR CHALLENGE REGARDLESS OF WHAT IT WOULD DO TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. -INTEREST RATES ARE RAISED TOO FAST TO KEEP UP WITH FAMILIES BUDGETS OR EVEN HAVING THE OPTIONS TO SELL BECAUSE NOW LESS PEOPLE CAN QUALIFY FOR MORTGAGE TO PURCHASE YOUR HOME. -IT IS VERY VERY IMPORTANT THAT HOMEOWNERS KNOW - AT A 3-5% INTEREST RATE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR YOUR CURRENT OR YOUR PAST FORECLOSED HOME -AT 8% OF COURSE YOU QUALIFY FOR A SMALLER LOAN BECAUSE MONEY IS MORE EXPENSIVE BORROW. -BECAUSE OF THE FAILED AND NAÏVE GREED FROM BUSH WITH THE HELP OF MCCAINS SENATE VOTE TO PUT BEN BERNANKE IN GREENSPANS POSITION WE ARE NOW IN THIS HORRIBLE BAIL-OUT MESS -ONCE THERE ARE LESS BUYERS IN YOUR NEW PRICE RANGE. YOUR HOME STAYS ON THE MARKET LONGER -FORECLOSURES START TO INCREASE AT THIS TIME -NOW YOU HAVE SLOWER SALES AND FORECLOSURES AS COMPS FOR NEW BUYERS WHO ARE TRYING TO QUALIFY FOR LOANS TO PURCHASE YOUR HOME. -THUS LEADS TO THIS MARKET FROM THE CONTINUED INCREASE OF THIS CYCLE OVER AND OVER AGAIN COMPLIMENTS OF BUSH AND 90% MCCAIN - -THANKS BUT NO THANKS - DARN ITS TO LATE FOR THAT -THIS BAILOUT SHOULD HAVE BEEN STARTED FROM HOMEWONERS UP NOT WALLSTREET DOWN OVER TWO YEARS AGO LIKE OBAMA SUGGESTED -THAT WOULD KEEP THE LOANS CURRENT WITH LESS CASUALTIES OF BUSH/MCCAINS CONTINUED POOR DECISIONS AND HORRIBLE NAÏVE MISTAKES NOW HOW IS THIS THE DEMOCRATS FAULT OR THE HOMEOWNERS FAULT WHEN BUSH RAISED THE INTEREST RATES TOO HIGH AND TOO FAST TO RUN STEADY WITH THE MARKET IT IS BUSH/MCCAINS FAULT AND ONLY THEIR FAULT MCCAIN DID THIS BEFORE WITH THE S&L SCANDAL IN 1987 AND THEN CREATED AN ACT THAT MCCAIN DOESNT EVEN FOLLOW HIMSELF AND THE TAXPAYER HAD TO BAIL HIM OUT THEN TOO THIS MELTDOWN IS 8 YEARS OF BUSHS/90%MCCAIN FAILED AND EMBARASSING ATTEMPT TO RUN OUR COUNTRY - WE HAD ENOUGH OF THE EPUBLICAN 6 PACK OF BEER AND PORK ITS TIME TO GET THE DEMOCRATIC SUPLUS THAT BUSH WENT INTO OFFICE IN 2000 AFTER BILL CILNTON, THE DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM DOES NOT WORK WHEN BUSH/90% MCCAIN GREED IS INVOLVED, MOST FORECLOSURES WERE CAUSED BY THE INCREASED INTEREST RATES OF ARM AND INTERST ONLY MORTAGES, NOT THE BLAMED FANNIE AND FREDDIE MAC LIKE THE REPUBLICANS WANT YOU TO BELIEVE - IT IS THEIR FAULT..
Author: AntiAmericanPalinAIP
Keywords: gas prices eviction foreclosures mccain libby animal killer anti jewish palin peta clinton biden obama america
Added: November 3, 2008
MCCAIN-BUSH ECONOMICS: UNEMPLOYED?? OVERSEA WORKERS AREN'T
JOHN MCKEATON5 MCCAIN OUTRAGEOUSLY VOTED AGAINST THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN PROTECTION ACT TWICE AND JOHN MCLIAR MCCAIN DID VOTE AGAINST THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT WHOS TO FLAME FOR GAS PRICES, UNEMPLOYMENT HIGHEST IN 5 YEARS (DURING BUSHS TERM), WORLD DISRESPECTING THE USA, AND YES FORECLOSURES - HERE IS WHY IT IS THE REPUBLICANS FAULT.. MCCAINS HISTORY: S&L SCANDAL - MCCAIN - KEATON CONTRIBUTIONS - 1987 MORTGAGE MELTDOWN - AMERIQUEST CONTRIBUTIONS - 2005 WALLSTREET BAILOUT - 2008 Here is how you got stuck paying the BAILOUT bill courtesy of Bush and McCain MCCAIN RECEIVED MONTHLY CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE PRESIDENT FOR DEREGULATIONS FOR THE PRIVATE LENDER AND TO INCREASE PROFIT BY INCREASING INTEREST RATES ON EXISTING LOANS IN 2005. WOW BUSH MCCAIN SCANDAL TIMELINE: -THE MORTGAGE MELTDOWN WAS NOT THE DEMOCRATS, CONSUMER, OR HOMEOWNERS FAULT, IT WAS THE POOR NAÏVE GREEDY AND FAIL REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP WITH REPUBLICAN SUPPORT -BUSH/MCCAIN BOTH HAVE A LONGTERM RELATIONSHIP WITH AMERIQUEST PRESIDENT ROLAND E. ARNALL -BUSHS NAÏVITY & GREED WANTED TO RAISE INTEREST RATES TO INCREASE BANK REVENUE LIKE OUR GAS PRICES - BANKS WERENT MAKING ENOUGH ON 3-5% INTEREST ONLY AND ADJUSTABLE ARM RATE LOANS -GREENSPAN REFUSED TO RAISE INTEREST RATES BECAUSE GREENSPAN KNEW IT WOULD OVER LOAD HOMEOWNERS BUDGETS AND TIGHTEN OUR ECONOMY FLOW. -BUSH THEN REPLACED GREENSPAN ON JANUARY 31, 2006 FOR A YES MAN (like McCain and palin) WITH BEN BERNANKE. -BEN BERNANKE THEN FOLLOWS BUSH ORDERS AND RAISES INTEREST RATES ON EXIST LOANS - YOUR MORTGAGE PAYMENT CONVENIENTLY GOES UP EVERY MONTH AND WHEN MOST ARMS WERE ABOUT TO EXPIRE -NOW WITH THE HIGHER INTEREST RATES LESS PEOPLE CAN AFFORD YOUR HOUSE BECAUSE MONEY IS MORE EXPENSIVE TO BORROW FROM LENDERS -MOST INTEREST ONLY AND ARM MORTGAGES WERE FROM PRIVATE LENDERS LIKE BUSH AND MCCAINS BUDDY THE PRESIDENT OF AMERIQUEST (On the same day that the White House announced that President Bush is nominating California billionaire Roland E. Arnall to be ambassador to the Netherlands, the company he controls said it would set aside $325 million for a possible settlement of allegations of predatory lending tactics.) -MCCAIN ALSO HAD A CONTINUED RELATIONSHIP FOR YEARS WITH AMERIQUEST PRESIDENT Roland E. Arnall AND RECEIVED DE-REGULATION MONEY TO VOTE IN AND RALLY OTHER REPUBLICANS TO VOTE FOR GREENSPANS REPLACEMENT, BEN BERNANKE TO FOLLOW BUSH ORDERS WITHOUT BERNANKE INPUT OR CHALLENGE REGARDLESS OF WHAT IT WOULD DO TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. -INTEREST RATES ARE RAISED TOO FAST TO KEEP UP WITH FAMILIES BUDGETS OR EVEN HAVING THE OPTIONS TO SELL BECAUSE NOW LESS PEOPLE CAN QUALIFY FOR MORTGAGE TO PURCHASE YOUR HOME. -IT IS VERY VERY IMPORTANT THAT HOMEOWNERS KNOW - AT A 3-5% INTEREST RATE YOU ARE QUALIFIED FOR YOUR CURRENT OR YOUR PAST FORECLOSED HOME -AT 8% OF COURSE YOU QUALIFY FOR A SMALLER LOAN BECAUSE MONEY IS MORE EXPENSIVE BORROW. -BECAUSE OF THE FAILED AND NAÏVE GREED FROM BUSH WITH THE HELP OF MCCAINS SENATE VOTE TO PUT BEN BERNANKE IN GREENSPANS POSITION WE ARE NOW IN THIS HORRIBLE BAIL-OUT MESS -ONCE THERE ARE LESS BUYERS IN YOUR NEW PRICE RANGE. YOUR HOME STAYS ON THE MARKET LONGER -FORECLOSURES START TO INCREASE AT THIS TIME -NOW YOU HAVE SLOWER SALES AND FORECLOSURES AS COMPS FOR NEW BUYERS WHO ARE TRYING TO QUALIFY FOR LOANS TO PURCHASE YOUR HOME. -THUS LEADS TO THIS MARKET FROM THE CONTINUED INCREASE OF THIS CYCLE OVER AND OVER AGAIN COMPLIMENTS OF BUSH AND 90% MCCAIN - -THANKS BUT NO THANKS - DARN ITS TO LATE FOR THAT -THIS BAILOUT SHOULD HAVE BEEN STARTED FROM HOMEWONERS UP NOT WALLSTREET DOWN OVER TWO YEARS AGO LIKE OBAMA SUGGESTED -THAT WOULD KEEP THE LOANS CURRENT WITH LESS CASUALTIES OF BUSH/MCCAINS CONTINUED POOR DECISIONS AND HORRIBLE NAÏVE MISTAKES NOW HOW IS THIS THE DEMOCRATS FAULT OR THE HOMEOWNERS FAULT WHEN BUSH RAISED THE INTEREST RATES TOO HIGH AND TOO FAST TO RUN STEADY WITH THE MARKET IT IS BUSH/MCCAINS FAULT AND ONLY THEIR FAULT MCCAIN DID THIS BEFORE WITH THE S&L SCANDAL IN 1987 AND THEN CREATED AN ACT THAT MCCAIN DOESNT EVEN FOLLOW HIMSELF AND THE TAXPAYER HAD TO BAIL HIM OUT THEN TOO THIS MELTDOWN IS 8 YEARS OF BUSHS/90%MCCAIN FAILED AND EMBARASSING ATTEMPT TO RUN OUR COUNTRY - WE HAD ENOUGH OF THE EPUBLICAN 6 PACK OF BEER AND PORK ITS TIME TO GET THE DEMOCRATIC SUPLUS THAT BUSH WENT INTO OFFICE IN 2000 AFTER BILL CILNTON, THE DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM DOES NOT WORK WHEN BUSH/90% MCCAIN GREED IS INVOLVED, MOST FORECLOSURES WERE CAUSED BY THE INCREASED INTEREST RATES OF ARM AND INTERST ONLY MORTAGES, NOT THE BLAMED FANNIE AND FREDDIE MAC LIKE THE REPUBLICANS WANT YOU TO BELIEVE - IT IS THEIR FAULT..
Author: AntiAmericanPalinAIP
Keywords: gas prices eviction foreclosures mccain libby animal killer anti jewish palin peta clinton biden obama america
Added: November 3, 2008